Blog

Instead, businesses are now expected to design for durability, repairability, reuse, and closed-loop recycling. This transition is not just a compliance response to regulation—it represents a deeper strategic shift toward system-level efficiency and resilience.

Circularity in 2025 is about structural reinvention. It entails:

• Reducing dependency on virgin materials.
• Minimizing lifecycle waste.
• Retaining value within production systems for as long as possible.
• Building economic models that prioritize use over ownership.

Policy and Market Drivers: Why Circularity is Accelerating Now

The acceleration toward circular systems is being driven by a convergence of external and internal factors. On the policy front, extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes, waste directives, product design regulations, and emissions-linked material taxes are all creating direct financial incentives for businesses to embed circular practices.

Notable regulatory shifts include:

• The EU’s Circular Economy Action Plan 2.0, which mandates eco-design requirements and reparability standards across key sectors.
• National-level bans on single-use plastics and landfill restrictions across multiple jurisdictions.
• Government-led procurement policies that favor circular suppliers and services.

From the market side, investor pressure is mounting as ESG scoring models increasingly factor in material circularity, waste intensity, and resource efficiency. Meanwhile, consumers—especially Gen Z and Millennials—are redefining ownership models, preferring access-based services and sustainable products.

In response, businesses are developing new revenue models built on leasing, subscription, refurbishment, and take-back systems, with product-as-a-service (PaaS) emerging as a viable pathway in electronics, apparel, construction, and mobility.

Innovation at the Core: Redesigning Systems, Not Just Products

Circularity in 2025 is not just about recycling—it is about designing waste out of the system from the beginning. This requires reengineering products, business models, and supply chains.

Key circular design strategies include:

• Modular Design: Allowing for easy disassembly, repair, and upgrade of components—seen notably in consumer electronics and industrial machinery.
• Material Substitution: Replacing non-renewable or hard-to-recycle inputs with bio-based, recycled, or regenerated materials.
• Reverse Logistics Infrastructure: Integrating take-back systems that enable businesses to reclaim used products and reintegrate them into the production cycle.
• Digital Product Passports: Attaching digital records to products to track materials, usage, and maintenance history—critical for transparency, traceability, and reuse.

Notably, sectors such as construction, automotive, and textiles are increasingly investing in closed-loop innovation. For example, construction companies are using prefabricated modular components that allow buildings to be disassembled and reused. In fashion, brands are integrating recycling into fabric sourcing and design to extend lifecycle utility.

The Role of Collaboration in Scaling Circularity

Despite increasing awareness and innovation, transitioning to a circular economy remains challenging for individual firms due to complex supply chains, capital intensity, and coordination gaps. As a result, industrial symbiosis and cross-sector collaboration are emerging as core enablers.

A strong example is the partnership between Neste, Borealis, and Covestro—turning discarded tires into feedstock for plastics in automotive applications. This collaborative approach:

• Enables resource sharing between industries.
• De-risks material sourcing for circular inputs.
• Spurs co-innovation for process integration.

Collaborative ecosystems are also accelerating the use of secondary materials marketplaces, shared logistics, and unified recycling standards—particularly within the EU and Asia-Pacific.

Circular Metrics and ESG Integration

For circularity to become operational at scale, it must be measured, monitored, and disclosed through credible ESG frameworks. In 2025, circular economy metrics are increasingly being integrated into mandatory and voluntary sustainability disclosure systems.

Key disclosure frameworks include:

• GRI (Global Reporting Initiative): Reporting on waste generation, material consumption, and product lifecycle.
• CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive): Requires companies in the EU to disclose circularity KPIs related to material usage, product durability, and end-of-life treatment.
• Science Based Targets Network (SBTN): Provides methodologies for businesses to set and report circularity-related targets within planetary boundaries.
• ISO 59000 series: Establishes international standards for implementing circular economy strategies in organizations.

Key performance indicators being adopted include:

• Percentage of recycled/reused content in products.
• Proportion of products collected at end-of-life.
• Resource productivity per unit of output.
• Lifetime extension metrics for capital goods.

Effective circularity metrics are essential for informing investors, meeting compliance thresholds, and aligning with procurement standards of public and multinational buyers.

Business Models and ROI: Why Circularity Makes Commercial Sense

The business case for circularity is growing stronger in 2025. While circular transitions require upfront investment in product redesign, supply chain reconfiguration, and reverse logistics, the long-term returns are tangible.

Circularity yields:

• Material cost reduction by reclaiming valuable resources and reducing raw material dependency.
• Resilience against supply chain shocks through diversified and localized sourcing.
• Brand equity from sustainability differentiation in consumer-facing industries.
• Revenue expansion through secondary markets (e.g., resale, refurbishment, repair services).
• Compliance preparedness against tightening regulations and waste-related liabilities.

Additionally, circularity aligns with broader decarbonization goals. Products that are modular, repairable, or reused have lower embedded carbon footprints and support Scope 3 emissions reductions—a critical component for meeting Net Zero commitments.

Risks and Implementation Challenges

Despite the opportunities, circular transformation is not without obstacles:

• Data gaps in lifecycle performance and material traceability.
• Lack of infrastructure for collection, sorting, and processing in many regions.
• Internal silos between design, procurement, and sustainability teams.
• Misaligned incentives across supply chain partners and value chain actors.

Addressing these requires organizational commitment, cross-functional alignment, and technology integration—especially in product tracking, emissions measurement, and supplier engagement systems.

The IFRSLAB Perspective

At IFRSLAB, we recognize that circular economy adoption is both a technical and strategic journey. As regulators tighten waste directives and stakeholders demand measurable sustainability, businesses must shift from pilot initiatives to enterprise-wide integration.

Our ESG advisory and reporting services help companies:

• Identify circular economy opportunities within current operations.
• Map material flows and design circular KPIs for ESG disclosures.
• Align with CSRD, GRI, SBTN, and ISO circularity standards.
• Build traceable, audit-grade frameworks that reduce risk and unlock long-term value.

In 2025 and beyond, circularity is not a “nice-to-have”—it is a business imperative. Let’s help you make it measurable, credible, and profitable.