
How ESG Helps UAE Companies Attract Investors
Learn how credible ESG strategy, reporting and assurance can improve investor confidence and access to sustainable finance in the UAE.
Companies listed on the Dubai Financial Market or Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange should prepare an annual sustainability report supported by reliable ESG data, defined reporting boundaries, documented methodologies and board-level oversight. Under the UAE Capital Market Authority’s integrated-reporting framework, the sustainability report forms part of the annual reporting package, and companies must follow the instructions issued by their relevant financial market. The DFM and ADX guidance documents help issuers structure environmental, social and governance disclosures, but preparing the report requires more than completing a list of indicators. Listed companies should establish materiality, data ownership, internal controls, evidence files, climate disclosures and approval procedures well before the annual reporting deadline.
Companies seeking a controlled ESG reporting process for listed companies should connect the reporting timetable, market metrics and framework requirements through one coordinated annual reporting programme.
The Capital Market Authority’s circular for the 2025 reporting year requires the integrated report to include the board report, auditor’s report, annual financial statements, governance report and sustainability report. The company must comply with the sustainability-reporting requirements issued by the UAE financial market on which it is listed.
The integrated report must be disclosed on the company’s website and the relevant financial market’s website within the first three months of the financial year and at least ten days before the annual general meeting, whichever occurs earlier. The CMA circular allows the component reports to be published together in one integrated document without preventing their separate disclosure.
The distinction between the reporting obligation and the exchange guides is important.
DFM describes its 2025 ESG Reporting Guide as voluntary guidance, but the guide also refers to mandated ESG data reporting for DFM- and ADX-listed companies. It encourages issuers to evaluate and report their performance against 32 ESG metrics aligned with international exchange initiatives and reporting frameworks.
ADX’s 2025 ESG Disclosure Guidance is also described as voluntary. However, it expressly states that it complements the UAE regulatory framework containing sustainability disclosure requirements for listed companies. ADX’s current sustainability overview separately states that its listed companies follow mandatory sustainability reporting and that it provides guidance through 31 essential ESG indicators.
Listed companies should therefore treat the guides as implementation tools while assessing compliance against the CMA framework and any current instructions, templates or circulars issued by the relevant exchange.
| Area | DFM-listed companies | ADX-listed companies |
| Underlying reporting position | Sustainability report required through the UAE integrated-reporting framework | Sustainability report required through the UAE integrated-reporting framework |
| Current main guidance | DFM Guide to ESG Reporting 2025 | ADX ESG Disclosure Guidance for Listed Companies, June 2025 |
| Status of guide | Voluntary implementation guidance | Voluntary guidance complementing regulatory requirements |
| Indicators referenced | 32 ESG metrics and indicators | 31 indicators described by ADX as essential to report |
| Frameworks considered | GRI, ISSB, SASB and other recognised frameworks | IFRS S1, IFRS S2, GRI, WFE and SSE guidance |
| Possible publication format | Annual report, integrated report or standalone ESG report | Annual report, integrated report or standalone ESG report |
| Main operational challenge | Coordinating metrics, materiality, evidence and annual-reporting deadlines | Establishing comparable disclosures, climate information, governance and data controls |
ADX also publishes a separate unified GCC metrics page referring to 29 standards issued by the GCC Exchanges Committee. This is distinct from the 31 indicators highlighted on ADX’s current sustainability overview. Companies should use the latest reporting instructions and metric template issued for their reporting period rather than relying on one historic indicator count.
The company should begin by documenting every requirement that may affect its ESG report. The register should cover:
Each item should be classified as mandatory, exchange-guided, framework-based or voluntary. The register should also assign an owner, evidence source and completion deadline.
This prevents two common problems: treating every suggested indicator as legally mandatory and overlooking a required disclosure because it does not appear in the selected international framework.
A listed company should clearly define who is responsible for sustainability matters and public ESG information. The governance framework should identify:
ADX’s guidance asks companies to explain the governance body or individuals responsible for sustainability-related risks and opportunities, how oversight is exercised and whether ESG performance is connected with remuneration.
Companies without a clear governance structure should consider developing an ESG strategy and governance framework before starting the annual report. This creates defined priorities, responsibilities, targets and management processes against which performance can be reported.
The reporting boundary determines which entities, facilities and activities appear in the report. It should address:
The ESG reporting boundary should be compared with the consolidated financial statements. Differences may be technically appropriate, particularly for greenhouse gas accounting, but they should be explained.
For example, a listed property group may consolidate several subsidiaries financially while applying an operational-control approach to determine which buildings enter its emissions inventory. Changes in acquisitions, disposals or control should also be considered when preparing comparative data.
Materiality determines which ESG issues require the greatest attention in the report.
Both the DFM and ADX guides place materiality within the reporting process. DFM describes a five-stage roadmap covering planning, stakeholder engagement and materiality, data collection, report development and optional assurance. ADX similarly recommends selecting a reporting framework, defining boundaries, engaging stakeholders, assessing material topics and collecting factual quantitative information.
Material topics will vary by industry:
| Sector | Potentially material topics |
| Banking | Financed emissions, responsible lending, cybersecurity, customer protection and financial inclusion |
| Real estate | Energy use, district cooling, climate resilience, construction emissions and worker welfare |
| Energy | Operational emissions, methane, water, safety, biodiversity and transition planning |
| Retail | Product sourcing, refrigerants, packaging, customer privacy and workforce practices |
| Telecommunications | Network energy, data security, digital inclusion and electronic waste |
| Transport | Fleet emissions, road safety, worker welfare and climate-resilient infrastructure |
The final material topics should be approved by senior management or the appropriate governance body and linked with strategy, risk management and measurable KPIs.
The environmental dataset may include:
ADX’s current guidance includes climate strategy, climate-related risks and opportunities, energy intensity, targets and governance over climate matters. It also asks companies to explain how sustainability-related risks affect their business models, value chains and prospects.
Emissions measurement should support more than annual disclosure. A structured Climate Risk & Decarbonization Strategy can help management connect the carbon baseline with physical and transition risks, scenario analysis, operational investment and measurable reduction actions.
Where a listed company reports renewable electricity use, the disclosure should be supported by consumption records, certificate details, beneficiary information and formal redemption evidence.
IFRSLAB’s I-REC Services can support the procurement and retirement of energy attribute certificates for relevant market-based Scope 2 claims. The report should distinguish certificate-backed electricity claims from actual reductions in electricity consumption.
Social information should be collected through controlled coordination between HR, health and safety, procurement, legal and operations. Relevant metrics may include:
Definitions should remain consistent across subsidiaries and reporting years. A company should explain whether temporary workers, contractors and outsourced personnel are included.
It should also distinguish activities from outcomes. Reporting the number of training sessions does not show the percentage of employees trained, learning outcomes or whether the programme addressed a material risk.
Governance information should remain consistent with the company’s formal governance report and market disclosures. The ESG report may address:
ADX’s guidance includes indicators covering board oversight, sustainability strategy, disclosure practices and external assurance.
Companies should verify that reported governance information agrees with board-secretariat records, approved policies, committee terms and other public disclosures.
A listed-company ESG report should operate within a controlled reporting environment.
| Disclosure | Typical supporting evidence |
| Electricity and cooling | Utility statements and meter reports |
| Fuel use | Invoices, fleet records and generator logs |
| GHG emissions | Calculation files, factors and methodology |
| Workforce metrics | HR-system extracts and payroll reconciliation |
| Safety performance | Incident registers and investigation reports |
| Training | Attendance records and learning-system reports |
| Board information | Minutes, registers and committee records |
| Ethics cases | Compliance registers and case summaries |
| Water and waste | Supplier statements and collection records |
| ESG targets | Board-approved plans and baseline calculations |
DFM recommends integrating ESG data collection into existing internal processes and subjecting it to internal-audit oversight. It also calls for disclosure of relevant assumptions, limitations and uncertainties.
Several indicators originate in financial systems. Energy expenses, payroll, supplier payments, capital expenditure and provisions should be reconciled with reported physical information. A controlled Accounting and Bookkeeping process can strengthen traceability between ESG disclosures and the underlying financial records.
External assurance is not presented in the DFM and ADX guides as universally compulsory for every ESG disclosure. However, both exchanges recognise verification as an important credibility mechanism.
DFM encourages listed companies to seek external assurance and describes assurance as the optional fifth stage of its reporting roadmap. ADX asks companies to state whether their sustainability information has been verified and to identify the KPIs covered.
Priority areas may include:
Companies preparing for verification should establish an ESG Linked Financial Assurance process covering KPI definitions, evidence files, calculation controls and consistency with financial reporting.
| Timing | Recommended activity |
| Six to nine months before publication | Confirm requirements, frameworks, governance and reporting boundaries |
| Four to six months before publication | Complete materiality and issue formal data requests |
| Three to four months before publication | Calculate environmental metrics and resolve data gaps |
| Two to three months before publication | Draft disclosures and complete technical review |
| One to two months before publication | Complete management, legal, internal audit and board review |
| Before the applicable deadline | Finalise assurance, design, approval and market disclosure |
The timetable should be integrated with the financial-close, annual-report and AGM process rather than operated as a separate communications project.
“For a listed company, ESG reporting belongs within the controlled annual reporting environment. The process must connect market indicators, materiality, governance, financial information and operational evidence. The most serious reporting weaknesses are normally unsupported metrics, inconsistent boundaries and public commitments that cannot be traced to approved strategies or reliable data.” — Layla Hassan, Senior ESG Reporting Consultant at IFRSLAB
IFRSLAB supports listed companies in establishing an ESG reporting process that responds to UAE capital-market requirements while remaining aligned with appropriate international standards. The engagement begins with an applicability and readiness assessment covering the listing market, sector obligations, reporting framework, current disclosures and annual reporting timetable.
The reporting programme is then structured around governance, materiality and controlled data collection. IFRSLAB works with finance, risk, internal audit, HR, operations, procurement, compliance and the board secretariat to define KPI methodologies, assign data ownership and establish supporting evidence. Environmental work may include greenhouse gas measurement, climate-risk disclosures, energy information and decarbonization targets, while social and governance disclosures are reconciled with company policies and formal records.
The final drafting process includes technical review, framework mapping and consistency checks against the financial statements, governance report and approved corporate commitments. Where independent assurance is planned, the evidence base and reporting controls are developed early enough to support an efficient and technically defensible review.
Discuss DFM or ADX ESG reporting readiness with IFRSLAB.
Layla Hassan
Senior ESG Reporting Consultant, IFRSLAB
Layla advises listed and regulated organisations on ESG reporting, materiality, sustainability governance, disclosure controls and alignment with UAE capital-market requirements. Her work focuses on integrating sustainability information into technically controlled annual reporting processes.
One I-REC(E) represents the energy attributes associated with one MWh of electricity generation. For a renewable electricity claim, the certificate should identify an eligible renewable source.
A company should make the claim only after checking that the certificates match its consumption, geography, reporting period and renewable technology requirements, and after the certificates have been redeemed for the correct beneficiary. The claim should state the level and nature of coverage accurately.
The accredited registry records certificate issuance, legal ownership, transfers and redemption. Once redeemed, a certificate is allocated to the stated beneficiary and cannot continue circulating for another end user’s claim.
Yes. Redeemed certificates can support renewable electricity disclosures and market-based Scope 2 reporting when the relevant reporting criteria are met. The report should disclose the methodology, coverage, certificate type and limitations rather than presenting a general unsupported renewable energy statement.
No. I-REC certificates track electricity-generation attributes, while carbon credits represent quantified emissions reductions or removals under separate standards and accounting systems. Purchasing an I-REC does not offset Scope 1 or Scope 3 emissions.

Learn how credible ESG strategy, reporting and assurance can improve investor confidence and access to sustainable finance in the UAE.

Learn what DFM- and ADX-listed companies should prepare for ESG reporting, including metrics, governance, evidence, assurance and a practical readiness checklist.

Learn how I-REC certificates help UAE companies prove renewable electricity use, support Scope 2 reporting and make credible ESG claims.
UAE : (+971) 52 710 0320 PAK : (+92) 300 2205746 UK : (+44) 786 501 4445
The Binary Tower by Omniyat,
19th Floor, Business Bay
S-25, Sea Breeze Plaza Shahrah-e-Faisal, Karachi
Office#1304, 13th Floor, Al Hafeez Heights, Gulberg III
P.O. Box 71, P.C. 100, Muscat
104 Broughton Lane Salford M6 6FL,
UAE : (+971) 52 710 0320 PAK : (+92) 300 2205746 UK : (+44) 786 501 4445
Office 2102 Al Saqr Business Tower 1, Sheikh Zayed Road
S-25, Sea Breeze Plaza Shahrah-e-Faisal, Karachi
Office#1304, 13th Floor, Al Hafeez Heights, Gulberg III
104 Broughton Lane Salford M6 6FL
P.O. Box 71, P.C. 100, Muscat
Typically replies within a day